|
CHERYL WILLS: Thank you for tuning into our webcast.
I'm Cheryl Wills. Back in the early '80s, when the first cases of AIDS
were reported, most people had never heard of acquired immunodeficiency
syndrome. They knew even less about the virus that causes AIDS -- HIV,
or human immunodeficiency virus. Now, in the 21st century, doctors know
a great deal more about HIV. Joining me today to discuss this is Dr.
Bruce Olmscheid. He's the director of HIV and AIDS education at St.
Vincent's Medical Center in New York. Thanks for joining us.
BRUCE OLMSCHEID, MD: A pleasure. Thank you.
CHERYL WILLS: And also Dr. Brian Boyle is here.
He's an attending physician at New York Presbyterian Hospital, and he's
also the assistant professor at Cornell University Medical College.
Thank you.
Of course, now, HIV has become something of a
household word. Let me start with you. What is HIV?
BRUCE OLMSCHEID, MD: HIV is a virus that is
transmitted through blood and body fluids. Once someone is exposed and
once they're infected, HIV gets into one of the specific cells in the
immune system that is responsible for helping the body to fight off
infections. HIV is a very smart, savvy little virus that has learned
how to get into a specific cell and destroy that cell, in the process
resulting in the patient losing a significant degree of their immune
system, so that they lose the ability to fight off infections.
CHERYL WILLS: Dr. Boyle, when a patient loses that
ability to fight infections and they have a weakened immune system, what
can happen?
BRIAN A. BOYLE, MD: It's a spectrum of
immunodeficiency that occurs with this disease. It starts, basically,
when the disease first starts. Many patients have a relatively normal
immune system, and then it's only over time that the immune system gets
worn out. The HIV virus is constantly attacking the human immune
system. That attack results in, eventually, the immune system wearing
down. So over time their CD4 count, or what patients call T-cells,
tends to fall, and that cell is the quarterback or director of the
immune system. As that cell is lost, the immune system is unable to
function normally. As the patients T-cells or CD4 count falls, the
patient becomes more and more at risk for various infections and certain
cancers, as well. We have certain numbers that we use as cutoffs, but
when the patient falls below a CD4 count of roughly 200, they become at
relatively high risk for infections and some cancers, and that's called
AIDS by definition.
CHERYL WILLS: The viral load is that whole
spectrum. When we hear people talk about their viral load, what are
they talking about, exactly?
BRUCE OLMSCHEID, MD: Well, we used to think that
during the 10 years or so between HIV disease and someone developing
AIDS that the virus was relatively quiescent, that it really was not
very active. Well, we know now that the virus is very active during
that entire time. The viral load is used as a predictor by us for how
rapidly someone might progress to AIDS, depending on what their CD4
count is. So there have been a bunch of analogies used, but one useful
analogy is that it's like a train going down a track and reaching a
certain destination, which is AIDS. The amount of track left is the CD4
count, but the speed of the train is the viral load. That tells you how
quickly someone is likely to progress. The higher the viral load means
that there's more virus, more HIV that's in your body attacking your
immune system. So as you can imagine, Cheryl, that tells you something
about how quickly that patient might progress.
CHERYL WILLS: Sure, sure.
BRIAN A. BOYLE, MD: Also, I like the analogy of the
train. I use that analogy a lot when I'm discussing this. But I think
another analogy that I've found is very helpful is for people to realize
that although I said the virus can get in and can attack and destroy
these T-cells, these T-cells have their own amazing ability to
regenerate themselves, as well. But we've learned that it's not
unlimited, and if people think of this as the fact that the virus and
the T-cells are in this constant battle with each other, I think it's
pretty easy to understand that the more virus there is, the sooner the
T-cells are going to not be able to -- It's like numbers of people on a
battlefield. So the higher the amount of the virus there is, the sooner
the T-cells are going to drop down to a number that's going to make that
person at risk for infection.
CHERYL WILLS: That leads me to my next point.
Initially when this virus was in its early stages, if you had HIV,
people just said you had AIDS. Now we know that this is an epidemic of
HIV and AIDS. Now, what's the cutoff point from having HIV to going to
having full-blown AIDS?
BRUCE OLMSCHEID, MD: That's actually pretty
straightforward. The definition is very clearcut in terms of the actual
CD4 count. Once the CD4 count drops below 200 or -- there's a
percentage that goes along with that -- if that percentage drops less
than 15%, then that person is no longer defined as simply having HIV
but, just by the number, is said to have AIDS rather than just HIV. I
think it's important to throw in and just remind, because people ask me
a lot, what's a normal number of T-cells? I think some people don't
remember that. I just went through that with someone today and reminded
someone that a normal number of T-cells is anywhere from 450 to about
1,700.
CHERYL WILLS: Most people with HIV have a range of
what?
BRUCE OLMSCHEID, MD: It can really vary.
CHERYL WILLS: Dr. Boyle, what causes a person with
HIV to get sick?
BRIAN A. BOYLE, MD: In addition to having a number
cutoff for the definition of AIDS, there are also various illnesses
that, if the patient gets those illnesses, those are what called
AIDS-defining illnesses. For example, Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia,
which is known by most patients as PCP, is a pneumonia that can tend to
occur at less than 200 T-cells. Because of that, we start patients on
prophylactic medications in an effort to prevent that. But Pneumocystis
pneumonia used to be the number one killer and what most patients
presented with when they were diagnosed with HIV. Now, because of the
effectiveness of prophylaxis, we can pretty much prevent that. Many
patients are being diagnosed earlier, so they're not coming into the
hospital with very low T-cells and Pneumocystis as their diagnosis. But
in addition to that, Cheryl, there are many, many diseases --
toxoplasmosis, cryptococcus -- a number of different organisms --
Mycobacterium avium complex, also known as MAC -- the list goes on and
on of different organisms that, when your immune system becomes
compromised or it doesn't work very well, that the patient becomes
susceptible to. The other things that commonly cause problems in our
patients are things such as cancers that, again, our immune system, not
too surprisingly, is also involved in preventing some cancers. Now we
know that such things as cervical cancers and Kaposi's sarcoma and some
lymphomas are certainly things that can make our patients sick as well,
and those tend to occur, again, when the patient's T-cells are lower, as
well. To answer your question in short order, it's a combination of
various infections that they become susceptible to as well as certain
cancers which are opportunistic by nature, as well.
BRUCE OLMSCHEID, MD: I might point out, if I could,
that that's very true, but I think it's important also to remember that
the way people get sick is that they're not being exposed to these
infections. These are infections that we all have in us. We've all
been exposed --
CHERYL WILLS: That we can normally fight.
BRUCE OLMSCHEID, MD: We have all been exposed to
many of these organisms throughout, and our body has maintained. We
don't even know we have them, we don't even know that they're in us.
CHERYL WILLS: Because our immunity can fight them
off.
BRUCE OLMSCHEID, MD: But as the T-cell count drops
down and gets below 200 and then below 100 and below 50, you become
increasingly susceptible to these infections activating or becoming
present in your body because the immune system can't keep them at bay.
CHERYL WILLS: So does everyone with HIV get sick?
Is that the natural course, or are there some people who can live with
HIV and just have a very normal life?
BRUCE OLMSCHEID, MD: We've actually had the
opportunity now, as this disease and infection has been around for --
we've known this for about two decades. That means we're getting old,
doesn't it? We know that there are what we are calling long-term non-progressors,
people who have been exposed to HIV and -- without getting into too much
of some of the other scientific details about what we know -- some
people are exposed to HIV -- they show up as HIV positive because the
antibody test is positive -- but they don't lose their T-cells. They
for some reason are able to maintain their T-cells. Now, many of them
have very low levels of the virus. You asked about the viral load test
before. We're able to measure not only the T-cells in blood, but we're
able to measure the viral load, the HIV viral load, the amount of virus
that's there, and for many patients who are long-term non-progressers,
their body has somehow established an equilibrium with the virus. They
have a very low level of the virus, and they don't progress.
BRIAN A. BOYLE, MD: And another category of patient,
who 10 years ago we didn't have but we have now, are the patients who
are on therapy, and antiretroviral therapy has now -- Does every patient
need to get sick? The answer to that is probably no. Many of the
problems with HIV can be stopped in their tracks by effective use of
antiretroviral therapy. So many of my patients, who probably would have
progressed over the past five, six, seven years to AIDS have not because
they have been taking antiretrovirals, and their T-cells have, in most
cases, stayed actually within normal ranges and their viral loads have
been suppressed to undetectable. Much as you would put a patient into
remission if they had cancer, the HIV can be put into remission by using
antiretroviral therapy.
CHERYL WILLS: Let's move on to how one contracts
HIV. There are a number of ways. Let me start with you. What's the
most common method of transmission?
BRUCE OLMSCHEID, MD: The two most common methods of
transmission are through blood or body fluids. We mentioned from
sharing needles or needle-stick injuries, needle-stick exposures in the
hospital, but the most common is sexual exposure, where the virus is in
vaginal fluid and in the semen, and just with the exchange of these body
fluids, the virus is transmitted from one person to another.
CHERYL WILLS: Sure, doctor. And everyone is at
risk. There is no one who has a special immunity.
BRUCE OLMSCHEID, MD: That's very true, yes.
CHERYL WILLS: Some people with risky behavior, you
would think they had a super-immunity, but really everyone is at risk.
BRIAN A. BOYLE, MD: I have some patients who have
only had one sexual partner, and I think what you need to remember, and
what people need to remember, is when they sleep with one person they're
sleeping with everyone that other person has every slept with. So, yes,
it's unfortunate, but even with a one-time sexual encounter, HIV can be
transmitted. Now, that's unusual, but it's certainly possible.
CHERYL WILLS: What are the best methods to prevent
transmission? Safe sex, I assume?
BRUCE OLMSCHEID, MD: We prefer to really use the
words "safer sex" rather than "safe sex," but it certainly is the use of
condoms to prevent exchange of fluid.
CHERYL WILLS: And no drug use, IV drug users?
BRIAN A. BOYLE, MD: Yes, IV drugs users need to -- I
think some needle exchange programs have actually been very, very
effective at preventing the spread.
BRUCE OLMSCHEID, MD: They're controversial, but very
effective at reducing the spread.
CHERYL WILLS: Post-exposure prophylaxis, what do you
think about that program? That, too, is controversial.
BRUCE OLMSCHEID, MD: It's very difficult. We're
involved in post-exposure prophylaxis. There are a number of different
programs and trials around the country and in the city.
CHERYL WILLS: And have been for a long time. It's
not an entirely new concept.
BRUCE OLMSCHEID, MD: There are a number of different
points. I think one of the first points I would really like to be sure
that people are aware of with this idea of post-exposure prophylaxis --
Let's define it first. What we're saying is, the idea of saying, "Well,
someone did something that put them at risk," the idea, the hope, the
thought that perhaps we could get one of these highly active
combinations of drugs into the system as soon as possible -- within two
hours, within eight hours, certainly within 72 hours.
CHERYL WILLS: That's the magic number, 72.
BRUCE OLMSCHEID, MD: But this is not a morning-after
pill. This is not a morning after pill, and it's very difficult to do
studies that are actually going to really show us whether it's effective
or not, because it's hard to know what the outcome would have been had
they not.
CHERYL WILLS: Sure. And we don't know for sure that
they actually were exposed.
BRUCE OLMSCHEID, MD: Exactly. But the idea here,
there is very good data looking at needle-stick exposures, needle-stick
transmissions in health care workers, where it's very easy to identify
the source patient and know whether that blood, the needle stick, was
from a positive patient or not. What we clearly have shown in that
population, if people start one of these regimens certainly within the
72 hours window, ideally within 24 hours, that it appears that we can
significantly reduce the risk of that person becoming exposed. Anything
to add on to that?
BRIAN A. BOYLE, MD: One of the problems is that it
kind of goes back to an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure,
because you have to take these medications for about four weeks, and
they're not easy medications to take. Many, many patients don't
tolerate them, and I've seen some studies where the ability of patients
to finish a four-week course of these medications is roughly 50% are
able to do it. So it's a very difficult course to take for four weeks,
so if you want to weigh the difficulty of preventing it by using, say,
safer sex or doing other things to avoid it, it's certainly much more
effective and much easier than having to go through this four weeks of
difficult and hard-to-take therapy.
CHERYL WILLS: Let's touch on the myths. Can you
contract HIV by handshakes?
BRIAN A. BOYLE, MD: No.
CHERYL WILLS: Kissing?
BRIAN A. BOYLE, MD: No.
CHERYL WILLS: A lot of people think you can. How do
we as health professionals better educate people to know that you can't
kiss someone and contract HIV, you can't get it from a handshake?
BRIAN A. BOYLE, MD: I think one of the things we do
commonly is, we talk with families of our patients, because they're the
ones who are most concerned, and I think justifiably so. They want
information. So I spend a lot of time sitting down with my patients and
their families and telling them about what the risk factors are and
aren't so that they feel comfortable at home eating off the same plate
and sharing a fork and drinking out of the same glass, because I think
there's nothing worse for HIV patients, with all the other things they
have to go through, than to have to be stigmatized in their own home.
CHERYL WILLS: What about oral sex?
BRUCE OLMSCHEID, MD: I knew you were going to ask
that.
CHERYL WILLS: That's a very, very common concern
among some people.
BRUCE OLMSCHEID, MD: I'm going to take the easy side
and let Dr. Boyle talk about the data that was just presented. It is
the one gray area that really, really creates confusion and anxiety for
patients. As I'm doing HIV testing and counseling and working with
patients over the long term now to have them adhering to safer sex
measures, many of them are having unprotected oral sex. Let's face it,
no one's going to use a condom for oral sex. People just don't want to
do it. So people are having a lot of unprotected oral sex. We really
try to speak to them about not exchanging fluids, if I can say that and
talk about that. But it's a gray area.
CHERYL WILLS: So you can contract HIV through -- Can
you or can't you?
BRIAN A. BOYLE, MD: You certainly can, and not only
through the semen, but pre-ejaculate also contains HIV, so some people
practice withdrawal before they actually ejaculate, but that is not
necessarily protective. There were some studies presented, one in
Geneva at the International AIDS Conference and one at Retrovirus a
couple of months ago that show that the incidence of infection among
patients newly being diagnosed with only oral sex as a risk factor was
about 6%.
BRUCE OLMSCHEID, MD: The only risk factor that they
would admit to.
BRIAN A. BOYLE, MD: Well, some of these studies,
Bruce that went back through and asked their partners and looked for
other reasons why they might have gotten it, and the only one they could
actually find -- I agree, it's not foolproof -- but they looked pretty
hard, at least in the San Francisco study to try to find other factors,
and then they excluded those people if they could. I think the one
thing we clearly agree upon -- and I think we pretty much agree, in toto
-- is that the risk is very, very low, and it cumulatively may add up to
somebody getting infected, but the risk of each individual encounter is
certainly lower than vaginal intercourse or anal intercourse or anything
of that nature. But can you get it? The answer is yes.
BRUCE OLMSCHEID, MD: When I talk with people and
counsel people about it, I really try to make sure that they understand
that if they're going to engage in unprotected oral sex to really
practice the withdrawal method, like you talked about, and that they
really have to realize that they're accepting some very low risk that I
can't put a number on for them. It's a very low risk and if we do this
over 10 years with multiple partners, is there a possibility that one
time they come in the test will be positive? The answer has to be yes,
there is a possibility.
CHERYL WILLS: Let's move on quickly to testing.
What does testing for HIV entail?
BRUCE OLMSCHEID, MD: Testing involves simply the use
of a blood test that looks for an antibody that is produced in response
to the virus being present. There are two different forms of the test.
There's an ELISA test that, if that is positive, the blood will then be
subjected to a more specific confirmatory type of test called the
Western blot test, and that will tell whether the patient's been exposed
or not.
CHERYL WILLS: Dr. Boyle, this can be anonymous,
right?
BRIAN A. BOYLE, MD: Yes. I think that's a very
important point. There's now an FDA-approved test that can be done at
home, and there is also a possibility of someone going to some clinics
that offer completely anonymous testing where they're identified by
number, not by name. I certainly understand people being afraid of
being diagnosed with HIV. There's still a stigma in our society,
although I think there should not, and it bears a lot of implications as
far as insurance issues and employment issues and family issues and
other things. But it's very important that they get tested and that
they get a diagnosis, especially today, because there are many, many
treatments available. One way that they can do this if they're hesitant
to go to their doctor and have it done or to go to someplace where they
may be identified is to go get anonymous testing or to get one of these
home access kits and do it from the privacy of their own home.
CHERYL WILLS: Great. So they have many options.
Dr. Boyle, Dr. Olmscheid, thank you both. And thank you for tuning in
to our webcast, and remember, science has come a long way in
understanding HIV and AIDS, and we hope we have helped you dissolve some
of the myths that are associated with that disease. I'm Cheryl Wills.
|